HomeSportsIchiro Suzuki Snubber still unknown after Bbwaa Batch has released remaining Hall...

Ichiro Suzuki Snubber still unknown after Bbwaa Batch has released remaining Hall of Fame voices

The single BBWAA voter that Ichiro Suzuki stays off for the Hall of Fame is still generally, and will probably remain in this way after the final release of ballot papers by the organization.

Each Hall of Fame stemnet is supplied with an option for the writer’s voices to be publicly released after the results have been announced, although many writers announce them in advance. The final list arrived on Tuesday, with 323 of the 394 votes (82%) available to the public. All 323 of them vote for Suzuki.

That means that the voter that Suzuki cost the status to be the second player in the MLB history that was unanimously chosen in the Hall of Fame, after Mariano Rivera, was one of the 71 voters who chose to stay anonymous.

The situation follows the precedent Van Derek Jeter, who also missed unanimity due to one vote, whose voter remains unknown five years later.

The situation is against the will of the BBWAA, who has voted in the past to make all votes public. It is actually the Hall of Fame who has rejected the requests of the organization to do this.

See also  Why NBA games on European soil are so important – especially when Victor Wembanyama is involved
Newly chosen Baseball Hall of Fame -Inductee Ichiro Suzuki talks to reporters during a press conference Thursday, January 23, 2025 in Cooperstown, NY (AP Photo/Hans Pennink)

Newly chosen Baseball Hall of Fame -Inductee Ichiro Suzuki talks to reporters during a press conference Thursday, January 23, 2025 in Cooperstown, NY (AP Photo/Hans Pennink)

Suzuki himself spoke respectfully about his only holdout and invites him to his own house for a drink and a discussion:

“I came to the Hall of Fame seven times, and this is my eighth time here in the Hall of Fame, and what an honor it is for me to be here like a Hall of Famer. This is a very special moment. I could receive a lot of votes from the writers, [I’m] Thankful for them, but there is one writer I could not vote for. I would like to invite him to my house, and we will have a drink together, and we will make a good conversation. “

Suzuki made Cooperstown’s class of 2025 on his first year of suitability. He will be accompanied by fellow First balloter CC Sabathia and Billy Wagner, who entered his 10th and final year of suitability. Dave Parker and Dick Allen have also made the class through the classic mood of the baseball committee, although the enhrinement of all will be posthumously.

See also  Deion Sanders: The only way I would consider coaching in the NFL is to coach my sons

Although only one player was once unanimously voted on the Hall of Fame, it is a measure of the respect that Suzuki has cultivated in his long career that news about his single snub was met with widespread indignation.

Most speculation about the mood is just the reason why. In the past that was not expected of any player ever that he was unanimous, simply because it was accepted that some voters refused to vote for players with their first mood because no other player – not Babe Ruth, not Willie Mays, not Rickey Henderson – has once been unanimous. The elections of Rivera showed that that was no longer true.

That leaves a few remaining possibilities why Suzuki didn’t get someone’s voice:

  • Legally believe that Suzuki is not a Hall of Famer: It would be a difficult argument to make, but perhaps there is really someone who doesn’t think a .311 battle average, 3000 hits, 10 all-star nods, 10 gold gloves, an MVP and a decorated career in Japan, not ‘ It guaranteed a place in Cooperstown. The smallest little voters.

  • Playing the game “He doesn’t need my voice”: Because the BBWAA and Hall of Fame elections only check a maximum of 10 players on their ballot, it is conceivable that someone looked at Suzuki and thought they could vote for 10 other players they think they deserve it while they have a player Leave behind while they left a player. Who clearly entered the hall, regardless of how they voted.

  • A legitimate error: A theory that was matched by Mike Petriello from MLB.com last week. People are fallible and it is quite possible that someone thought they had checked Suzuki and not. That exact scenario actually happened when players were asked to fill their own voice, because a player loved Suzuki and did not know he had done this until he was asked.

  • Want to see how the world is burning, or whatever: Maybe someone there is really, really not from Suzuki, or does he want to make a strange point about … something? We could speculate for days, but let’s say that personal reasons can also be in the game.

See also  Asked and Answered: Week 18 is over. Is there any way to fix it?

We will probably never know who did not vote for Suzuki, and that is why we will probably never know the reason why. It doesn’t really matter in the long term, but nobody likes an unsolved case that gets cold.

- Advertisement -
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments