Washington (AP)-A civil servant of the Treasury Department wrote a letter to federal legislators on Tuesday and said that a technical director collaborates with the Ministry of Government Efficiency of Elon Musk “Only reading access” will have the government payment system.
The officer sent the letter from the concern of members of the congress that DOGE in the payment system for the federal government could lead to safety risks or missed payments for programs such as social security and medicine.
Doge, a Trump Administration Task Force that is assigned to find ways to dismiss federal employees, lower programs and lower the federal regulations, has expressed concern about its intentions and the cancellation of career officials at multiple agencies. Democratic legislators have expressed frustration about the lack of transparency and public accountability and say that the people of Musk payments could illegally include their political agenda.
Familiar news and daily pleasure, exactly in your inbox
Watch yourself-the Yodel is the source for daily news, entertainment and feel-good stories.
The officer said that the current “assessment” “” has not caused payments for obligations such as social security and medicine to delay or to deal. “
The letter said that Tom Krause, who is also mentioned online as CEO of Cloud Software Group, worked at Treasury as a ‘special government officer’. The letter also said that Krause makes the efforts in coordination with career financing officials.
Treasury’s payments are managed by the tax service, which performs more than 1.2 billion transactions annually and accounts for 90% of the federal payouts. The official said that the assessment is about the integrity of the payment integrity.
However, some Democrats are not convinced of the idea that Doge has only read access.
“Some Republicans try to suggest that Musk only ‘looks’ access to the very sensitive payment system of the Treasury as if that is also acceptable,” said Senator Patty Murray, D-Wash., Vice-chairman of the Senate Credit Committee, in a statement.
“But why on earth should we believe that – especially if he says exactly the opposite loud and repeated that everyone can see it?”