HomeTop StoriesActor Jussie Smollett's conviction has been overturned by the Illinois Supreme Court

Actor Jussie Smollett’s conviction has been overturned by the Illinois Supreme Court

CHICAGO (CBS) – The Illinois Supreme Court on Thursday overturned the conviction of former Empire actor Jussie Smollett for orchestrating a hate crime hoax.

Smollett was convicted of five counts of disorderly conduct and sentenced to 150 days in prison in 2021, but was released after just six days behind bars while he was appealing. Smollett has maintained his innocence from the start.

Smollett claimed he was the victim of a racist and homophobic attack near his Streeterville apartment in January 2019 after walking several blocks to a Subway sandwich shop.

After police investigated his claims, detectives later focused on Smollett himself, and he was accused of committing a fake hate crime against himself with brothers Abel and Ola Osundairo, who later testified that he paid them to cover the attack to organize.

Defense attorneys had argued that his trial violated the Fifth Amendment’s protections against double jeopardy after Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx’s office agreed to drop the original charges against him.

A special prosecutor was later appointed to re-examine the case and new charges were filed against him, but Smollett’s attorneys have argued that the special prosecutor should never have filed new charges.

See also  Matt Gaetz Withdraws as Attorney General Candidate, Says “Trump's DOJ Needs to Be There and Ready on Day 1”

On Thursday, the state’s highest court sided with Smollett’s attorneys, overturning his conviction and ordering the case against him to be dismissed.

“Today we resolve a question about the state’s responsibility to honor the agreements it makes with defendants. In particular, we examine the question of whether a dismissal of a case by nolle prosequi allows the state to bring a second prosecution when the dismissal was entered into as part of an agreement. with the defendant and the defendant has fulfilled his part of the bargain. We believe that a second prosecution under these circumstances is a violation of due process, and therefore we reverse the defendant’s conviction,” Judge Elizabeth Rochford wrote in the court’s ruling.

Cook County prosecutors dropped the original charge against Smollett weeks after he was indicted in exchange for forfeiting his $10,000 bond and performing 16 hours of community service, but a judge later ruled that the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office County, Kim Foxx, mishandled the case and appointed a prosecutor. special prosecutor to investigate.

See also  LeBron and Bronny James are making history as the first father-son duo in the NBA to play together

That special prosecutor later filed new charges against Smollett he was convicted of five counts of disorderly conduct and sentenced to 150 days in jail. He only served six days of that sentence before being released while he appealed his case.

Last December one The Illinois Appellate Court panel affirmed Smollett’s convictionsiding with prosecutors who claimed there was no evidence, prosecutors had agreed not to prosecute Smollett further when the initial charges against him were dropped.

But Judge Freddrenna Lyle disagreed, arguing it was “fundamentally unfair” to appoint a special prosecutor who would charge Smollett a second time after reaching an agreement he believed would end the case .

In overturning Smollett’s conviction, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed with attorneys that the special counsel’s decision to file new charges violated Smollett’s rights after the original case was dropped and Smollett agreed to forfeit his $10,000 bond.

“It defies credulity to believe that the defendant would agree to forfeit $10,000, with the understanding that [prosecutors] He could simply retry him the next day,” the court ruling said.

See also  Striking hotel workers in San Francisco arrested after blocking the street

The Illinois Supreme Court sent Smollett’s case back to the trial court to formally dismiss the charges.

“We are aware that this case has generated significant public interest and that many people were dissatisfied with the resolution of the original case and felt it was unfair,” the opinion said. “Nevertheless, what would be more unjust than the resolution of any criminal case would be a finding by this court that the state was not required to honor agreements upon which people have harmfully relied.”

Rebecca Yarros on her rise, the success of ‘Fourth Wing’ and her new book

Paul Simon’s look at the Stanford Initiative to Cure Hearing Loss

American Airlines’ new system is cracking down on passengers who want to board the plane early

- Advertisement -
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments