HomePoliticsThe House ethics panel is reviewing two GOP lawmakers' campaign payments to...

The House ethics panel is reviewing two GOP lawmakers’ campaign payments to private social clubs

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Ethics Committee said Monday it is investigating separate allegations against two Republican congressmen from Texas who allege they violated ethics rules by using campaign funds to pay membership fees at private social clubs.

The bipartisan panel released findings that Rep. Ronnie JacksonThe organization’s campaign committee had paid more than $6,800 in membership fees to The Amarillo Club, a gourmet club and gym in downtown Amarillo. And the ethics committee also released a report on a separate investigation that found Rep. Wesley Hunt‘s campaign had paid more than $5,400 in dues to The Oak Room, a private social club in Houston.

The Ethics Commission said it will look further into the payments, but that does not mean there have been proven violations of ethics rules.

Lawyers for Hunt said in a response to the Ethics Commission that the congressman had not used the membership for personal use, but instead to meet with campaign donors and advisers. Hunt believed that membership in the Post Oak Club, which includes access to a meeting room, “would be a wiser use of campaign funds” than a campaign office, his lawyers said.

See also  “Black history is American history,” Biden says as he makes another appeal to voters

Lawyers for Hunt pointed out that the Federal Election Commission allows candidates to use campaign funds for memberships in “an organization purported to have political interests,” such as the Capitol Hill Club, a private Republican club just steps from House offices, or the nearby National Democratic Club.

A spokeswoman for Jackson said the investigation was based on a previous complaint from two years ago, that no new information had been brought forward and that his office had complied with the commission.

The Office of Congressional Ethics, which conducted the investigations, said neither lawmaker agreed to cooperate with the reviews. The independent, nonpartisan agency is tasked with reviewing allegations against members and other staff of the House of Representatives and referring issues it finds to the House Ethics Committee, which is made up of lawmakers.

“Unfortunately, this is not the first time that leftists at OCE (Office of Congressional Ethics) have decided to waste taxpayer dollars by going after public officials for nothing,” Jackson’s office said in a statement.

See also  The Republican National Committee is preparing for a convention that Trump is barred from attending

Jackson has faced criticism before. Before being elected to the House in 2020, he was a top White House doctor under former Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump and became known for his comments on Trump’s health.

Trump nominated him as secretary of Veterans Affairs, but withdrew his nomination amid allegations of professional misconduct. An internal Defense Department investigation later concluded that Jackson made “sexual and derogatory” comments about a female subordinate, violated policies against drinking alcohol during a presidential trip and used prescription sleeping medications that raised concerns among his colleagues about his abilities . to provide good medical care.

Jackson has denied these allegations, describing them as politically motivated.

In the case before the Ethics Commission, Jackson’s campaign had paid monthly contributions of about $175 to The Amarillo Club since 2021. Beginning in April of last year, the campaign disclosed the monthly payments as “membership for exclusive campaign purposes,” according to the committee report. .

See also  Hunter Biden found guilty of all three charges in federal gun case

The social club, which also has a gym and gives members access to affiliated clubs across the country, says on its website that its “members have created lasting bonds and a network of connections.”

The House of Representatives ethics manual instructs lawmakers not to use campaign funds for personal use, including to improve their lifestyle or pay for personal obligations. However, it gives them broad discretion in determining what counts as a campaign or political expenditure.

- Advertisement -
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments