Toyota Motor North America has spoken out about California’s ambitious new electric vehicle (EV) mandates, calling the targets “impossible” given the slow growth of electric vehicles in America. Currently, only 9% of U.S. car buyers choose electric cars, and in many states the EV adoption rate is even lower.
Don’t miss:
However, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has set an ambitious mandate that by 2026, 35% of all light-duty vehicle sales must be zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) or plug-in hybrids. The ultimate goal is that by 2035, every new car sold in the state must be zero-emission.
As quoted by CNBC, Toyota Chief Operating Officer Jack Hollis questioned the feasibility of such a timeline, saying, “I have not seen a forecast from anyone – government or private – that says this number is achievable.”
Toyota fears the mandate could force automakers to ignore what customers need, especially in markets where electric vehicles are less popular. Hollis suggested that pushing automakers to meet these demands without adequate market support could limit consumer choice.
Trending: With over 7.8k investors, including Meta, Google, and Amazon Execs, this AI startup’s valuation has skyrocketed from $5 million to $85 million in just three years. Be an early investor today with just $1,000 for just $0.50/share before the offer closes next week!
California has historically taken a strict stance on emissions, setting standards that are stricter than those required nationally under a federal waiver. This has led to a split market, with some states following California’s rules, while others follow national regulations.
However, Toyota is calling for a single national standard, arguing that a uniform rule for all states would help automakers produce cars more easily. “We would always want a 50-state rule because that way we can treat all customers, all dealers, equally,” Hollis explains.
See also: Maker of the $60,000 foldable house has built 3 factory buildings, more than 600 houses and big plans to fix housing – you can become an investor today for $0.80 per share.
The debate over emission standards has led to much discussion throughout the sector. Hollis said California’s mandate could limit consumer choice by reducing the number of models available. Some politicians, including Democrat Elissa Slotkin, have echoed similar points, saying, “What you govern is your decision, and no one else’s.”
Although Toyota has been clear in its criticism, it is not the only automaker to doubt the feasibility of California’s goals. Other automakers have also expressed concerns about whether such rapid change is possible with the current infrastructure and market.
Environmentalists counter that these requirements are necessary to tackle climate change and promote a cleaner future for the auto sector. Such policies and incentives, they argue, can help bridge the gap in EV adoption across the country, even in states with lower demand.
Read next:
Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge’s unique market trading ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights which can give you an edge in today’s competitive market.
Want the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
This article Toyota Denounces California’s ‘Impossible’ EV Mandate, Calls for National Regulations to Protect Consumers and Keep Manufacturing Viable originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
